571-765-7700
Microsoft Must Pay Individual Inventor Reasonable Royalty “And” Interest
|
The word “and” in claim was construed as meaning “and/or”
Dismissal of Declaratory Judgment Action Incomplete
|
District Court needed to provide further explanation for dismissal of complaint against mobile banking patents
Pre-Appeal Brief Requests for Review – High Success Rate for PTAB Appellants
|
An examiner final rejection decision may be contested in multiple ways. A straightforward, fast and inexpensive way is to utilize MPEP § 1204.02 and its Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Procedure
Unusual Finding Vacates IPR After Federal Circuit Affirmance
|
“Typically, cases are not terminated on remand after the merits have been affirmed.”
Providing Notice of Infringement Can Create Personal Jurisdiction
|
Amplifying allegations of infringement results in litigation in accused infringer's home forum
General Skepticism Does Not Negate Motivation to Combine
|
Surgeon’s skepticism of robot surgery doesn’t make robot surgeon patentable
Opinion of Counsel Could Save $4 Million
|
Attorney’s confusion about technical jargon should not have negated reliance on the substance of the opinion
Disclaimer Argument Built With Expert Testimony Falls Apart
|
Nintendo fails to show disclaimer beyond “audio or higher frequency” signals
Claims Reciting “Code,” “Application,” and “System” Avoid Means-Plus-Function Treatment
|
Testimony weighs in favor of presumption that terms are not governed under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6
U.S. Patent Office Judges Don’t Have to Examine Substitute Claims
|
No obligation to volunteer unpatentability issues for a proposed substitute claim based on the prior art of record
Microsoft Must Pay Individual Inventor Reasonable Royalty “And” Interest
|
The word “and” in claim was construed as meaning “and/or”
Dismissal of Declaratory Judgment Action Incomplete
|
District Court needed to provide further explanation for dismissal of complaint against mobile banking patents
Pre-Appeal Brief Requests for Review – High Success Rate for PTAB Appellants
|
An examiner final rejection decision may be contested in multiple ways. A straightforward, fast and inexpensive way is to utilize MPEP § 1204.02 and its Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Procedure
Unusual Finding Vacates IPR After Federal Circuit Affirmance
|
“Typically, cases are not terminated on remand after the merits have been affirmed.”
Providing Notice of Infringement Can Create Personal Jurisdiction
|
Amplifying allegations of infringement results in litigation in accused infringer's home forum
General Skepticism Does Not Negate Motivation to Combine
|
Surgeon’s skepticism of robot surgery doesn’t make robot surgeon patentable
Opinion of Counsel Could Save $4 Million
|
Attorney’s confusion about technical jargon should not have negated reliance on the substance of the opinion
Disclaimer Argument Built With Expert Testimony Falls Apart
|
Nintendo fails to show disclaimer beyond “audio or higher frequency” signals
Claims Reciting “Code,” “Application,” and “System” Avoid Means-Plus-Function Treatment
|
Testimony weighs in favor of presumption that terms are not governed under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6
U.S. Patent Office Judges Don’t Have to Examine Substitute Claims
|
No obligation to volunteer unpatentability issues for a proposed substitute claim based on the prior art of record