+ Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Rose Electronics, et al., U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. 2:06-CV-01711-MJP. Patent infringement relating to computerized switching systems for remote administration of computers. + L’Enfant Trust v. Capitol Historic Trust, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:04-CV-01735-RJL. Trademark/service mark infringement action relating to conservation easement donation services.
+ Automated Merchandising Systems Inc. v. Fawn Engineering Corp., et al., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, No. 3:04-CV-00007-WCB. Patent infringement relating to optical vend detection systems for vending machines.
+ Forcillo v. Lemond Fitness, Inc., et al., U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. 2:04-CV-00848-JLR. Patent infringement relating to exercise bikes.
+ ITT Manufacturing Industries, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:03-CV-01086-GMS. Patent infringement relating to GPS functionality in cellular phones.
+ Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. ClearCube Technology, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, No. 5:03-CV-02875. Patent infringement relating to accurate transmission of computer video over long distances.
+ Automated Merchandising Systems Inc. v. Automatic Products International Ltd., et al., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, No. 3:02-CV-00082-WCB. Patent infringement relating to optical vend detection systems for vending machines.
+ Moore v. Poser, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, 2002. Patent infringement relating to business forms.
+ Moore v. Standard Register, U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, 2002. Patent infringement relating to business forms.
+ Apex, Inc. v. Raritan Computer, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:01-CV-04435-PKC. Patent infringement relating to computerized switching systems for remote administration of computers.
+ Apex PC Solutions, Inc. v. Cybex Computer Products Corp., U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. 98-CV-246Z. Patent infringement relating to computerized switching systems for remote administration of computers.
+ Ericsson, Inc., et al. v. Harris Corp., et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 4:98-CV-325. Patent infringement relating to (1) integrated circuits used in telecommunication systems, and (2) semiconductor fabrication technology.
+ Tekmax Inc. v. Exide Corp., U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 1995-1996. Patent infringement relating to automotive battery plate stackers.
+ Hester Industries v. Tyson Foods, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, 1995-1997. Trademark infringement and contempt action relating to “Wing Fling” trademark.
+ Gencor v. Astec, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, 1995-1996. Patent infringement relating to commercial asphalt plant and mixers.
+ Citibank v. Online, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1995. Patent infringement relating to telephones for remote banking.
+ Sitrick v. Nintendo, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 1994-1995. Patent infringement relating to hand held video game.
+ Quantum Design v. LakeShore Cryotronics, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, 1995. Patent infringement relating to measuring instruments.
+ Haworth v. Herman Miller, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, 1992-1996. Patent infringement relating to powered furniture panels.
+ Haworth v. Allsteel, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 1991-1992. Patent infringement relating to powered furniture panels.
+ Haworth v. Steelcase, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, 1989-1995. Patent infringement relating to powered furniture panels.
+ Allied v. Knogo, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1991. Patent infringement relating to amorphous metal security tags.
+ Holland Sweetener v. NutraSweet, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, 1990.
+ Patent infringement relating to Aspartame patents.
The results obtained in these matters are not necessarily indicative of the results obtained in other or future matters.