571-765-7700
Pre-Appeal Brief Requests for Review – High Success Rate for PTAB Appellants
|
An examiner final rejection decision may be contested in multiple ways. A straightforward, fast and inexpensive way is to utilize MPEP § 1204.02 and its Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Procedure
Unusual Finding Vacates IPR After Federal Circuit Affirmance
|
“Typically, cases are not terminated on remand after the merits have been affirmed.”
General Skepticism Does Not Negate Motivation to Combine
|
Surgeon’s skepticism of robot surgery doesn’t make robot surgeon patentable
U.S. Patent Office Judges Don’t Have to Examine Substitute Claims
|
No obligation to volunteer unpatentability issues for a proposed substitute claim based on the prior art of record
Fiscal Year 2022 Has Seen Many PTAB Appeal Briefs Go Unanswered By Examiners
|
DBJG recently obtained PTO data showing that the main briefs filed by PTAB appellants carry the day 35% of the time
Negative Claim Limitation Satisfied by Silence
|
Claims to acne treatment “without” ingredient invalidated by reference that did not mention the ingredient
Pre-Appeal Brief Requests for Review – High Success Rate for PTAB Appellants
|
An examiner final rejection decision may be contested in multiple ways. A straightforward, fast and inexpensive way is to utilize MPEP § 1204.02 and its Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Procedure
Parachute Patent Fails to Deploy
|
Patent combining ballistic parachute and autopilot system found obvious
Apple Fails English Grammar Test at Federal Circuit
|
The term “fields” requires more than one field
Parallel Actions Fail to Efficiently Resolve Patent Dispute
|
Patent owner faces another hurdle to relief after an ITC proceeding, PTAB trials, and an appeal to the Federal Circuit
Pre-Appeal Brief Requests for Review – High Success Rate for PTAB Appellants
|
An examiner final rejection decision may be contested in multiple ways. A straightforward, fast and inexpensive way is to utilize MPEP § 1204.02 and its Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Procedure
Unusual Finding Vacates IPR After Federal Circuit Affirmance
|
“Typically, cases are not terminated on remand after the merits have been affirmed.”
General Skepticism Does Not Negate Motivation to Combine
|
Surgeon’s skepticism of robot surgery doesn’t make robot surgeon patentable
U.S. Patent Office Judges Don’t Have to Examine Substitute Claims
|
No obligation to volunteer unpatentability issues for a proposed substitute claim based on the prior art of record
Fiscal Year 2022 Has Seen Many PTAB Appeal Briefs Go Unanswered By Examiners
|
DBJG recently obtained PTO data showing that the main briefs filed by PTAB appellants carry the day 35% of the time
Negative Claim Limitation Satisfied by Silence
|
Claims to acne treatment “without” ingredient invalidated by reference that did not mention the ingredient
Pre-Appeal Brief Requests for Review – High Success Rate for PTAB Appellants
|
An examiner final rejection decision may be contested in multiple ways. A straightforward, fast and inexpensive way is to utilize MPEP § 1204.02 and its Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Procedure
Parachute Patent Fails to Deploy
|
Patent combining ballistic parachute and autopilot system found obvious
Apple Fails English Grammar Test at Federal Circuit
|
The term “fields” requires more than one field
Parallel Actions Fail to Efficiently Resolve Patent Dispute
|
Patent owner faces another hurdle to relief after an ITC proceeding, PTAB trials, and an appeal to the Federal Circuit